Sarah Palin Information Blog

Sarah Palin Web Brigade

  • Upcoming Palin Events

  • Sarah Palin’s Endorsees

  • Sarah Palin Channel

  • Amazing America

  • The Undefeated

  • ‘Stars Earn Stripes’

  • ‘Game Change’ Lies Exposed

  • Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas

  • Our Sarah: Made in Alaska

  • America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag

  • Going Rogue: An American Life

  • Other Sarah Palin Info Sources

  • Login/RSS

  • Governor Palin on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinUSA

  • Governor Palin on Facebook

  • SarahPAC Notes

  • RSS SarahPAC Notes

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • SPWB on Facebook

  • SPWB on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinLinks

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Join the SPWB Twibe!

  • Posts by Date

    February 2011
    S M T W T F S
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • __________________________________________
  • Top Posts & Pages

  • __________________________________________
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • __________________________________________

Archive for February 18th, 2011


Posted by Sarah Palin Web Brigade on February 18, 2011

Excellent article by Matthew Continetti at The Weekly Standard about why Governor Sarah Palin resigned:

Out of Alaska

Sarah Palin on why she resigned and what it means for her future.

Jul 20, 2009, Vol. 14, No. 41 • By MATTHEW CONTINETTI

In early July, while most Americans were preparing for a long weekend of celebratory parades, charred meats, and noisy fireworks, Sarah Palin made some plans of her own. The Alaska governor had been the object of endless media attention and assorted calumnies since she became John McCain’s vice presidential nominee last August. Now she wanted to try something new. So, on July 3, in a speech delivered from her home on Lake Lucille in Wasilla, Palin told her constituents that not only would she not seek a second term, but she would also be transferring authority to Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell on July 26, abdicating her office with about 18 months left to go. The announcement, as one might expect, received global press coverage, dominated the weekend headlines, and gave stories about the late Michael Jackson a run for their money. Meantime, the political world went into sustained convulsions.

The fierce reaction surprised Palin. She is acutely aware of what the media and her opponents say about her. She heard some people say that the timing of her speech was odd. Not so. “Independence Day is so significant to me–it’s sort of a way for me to illustrate that I want freedom for Alaskans to progress, and for me personally,” she told me during a telephone interview on July 9. Others said the motivation for her resignation was not clear. “I’m like, ‘Holy Jeez, I spoke for 20 minutes’ ” giving reasons, she said. Bloggers conjectured that a horrible scandal was looming over her. Nope. Palin says she even heard a rumor that she resigned because pornographic pictures of her were about to hit the Internet. This left her bemused. “Between which pregnancies did I get to pose for those?” she said sarcastically. The obstinacy of her enemies, the fact that they consistently attribute bad-faith to her and accuse her of double-speaking, continues to mystify her. Hearing all the innuendo, Palin said to herself, “Really? You can’t just believe what I’m saying?”

One thing you quickly learn about Sarah Palin when you study her career is that she never, ever does things by the book. The lady knows how to make a splash. She specializes in surprise announcements. Her 2004 resignation from the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, her 2005 declaration that she was challenging incumbent Frank Murkowski for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, her March 2008 revelation that she was seven months pregnant with her fifth child, then her August 2008 addition to the GOP presidential ticket and the subsequent shocker that her 17-year-old daughter was pregnant: All galvanized public opinion and upset established patterns of doing business.

Palin likes gambles. Her career is filled with firsts. In 2006, Palin became the first woman governor in Alaska history (as well as the youngest). In 2008, she became the first woman to appear on a GOP presidential ballot. And on July 3, she probably became the first governor with a 54-percent approval rating to resign from office for reasons having nothing to do with scandal or appointment to another job.

Palin says she had been thinking about her decision for a while, and had talked to various people about it. In January, during her state of the state address to the Alaska legislature, she asked lawmakers to put the previous year’s election behind them. “I asked them not to allow those distractions that were on the periphery to hamper the state’s progress,” Palin told me. But her plea went unheeded. “It became obvious in the last months especially that too many people weren’t going to ignore those things on the periphery,” she said. As the months passed, Palin arrived at the conclusion that she didn’t want a second term as Alaska’s governor. She had achieved what she had set out to do, so why bother with one more lame-duck legislative session in 2010? “I know that we’ve accomplished more in our two years in office than most governors could hope to accomplish in two terms,” Palin said. “And that’s because I hired the right people.” For Palin to remain shuttling between Juneau, Anchorage, and Wasilla would waste both her and her constituents’ time. And “I cannot waste time,” she said. “I cannot waste resources.”

Before the announcement, Palin gave no public sign that she was thinking of resigning. When I visited Alaska in May, I heard widespread speculation that the governor would not run for reelection, but no one mentioned the possibility that she would resign. That announcement, Palin’s sometime pollster David Dittman told me last week, was “out of the blue.” Alaska’s next governor, Sean Parnell, reportedly found out that he was getting a promotion only a few days prior to Palin’s announcement. The Alaska GOP chairman, Randy Ruedrich, who has clashed with Palin in the past, also expressed surprise. When I asked another plugged-in Alaska Republican for comment on Palin’s decision, the response was, “Where do I begin?”

Palin’s unconventionality and authenticity is the key to her appeal. She may move contrariwise to elite opinion in Washington and New York, but doing so strengthens her bond with conservative Republicans across the country. The things that make liberals flip-out at the first mention of Palin are exactly the ones that rally conservatives to her side. Liberals view Palin’s resignation as a sign of weakness. Conservatives view it as attractive nonconformity. “To her credit,” Dittman said, “she just didn’t tip off a few people and go through the motions for a year and a half.”

Why is Palin leaving? At this writing, there is no reason to doubt her stated position: Her enemies’ concerted efforts to tear her down have caused her family financial stress and distracted her from her duties as governor. Since she returned to Alaska in November 2008, she has been hemmed in. Ethics complaints, insults, invective, undue attention, and legal bills have been all-consuming. “I can’t fight for what’s right when I’m shackled to the governor’s seat,” Palin said. For the last seven months the governor’s office has been a ward. A trap. She is breaking free.

Palin likes to say “everything changed” for her on August 29, 2008, the day she was introduced as John McCain’s running mate. That may be an understatement. Before then, Palin was an extremely popular governor known to Alaskans as a bipartisan reformer and a champion of clean government. Outside Alaska, she was almost completely unknown. When she strode onstage with McCain that August day in Dayton, Ohio, the only thing the global media knew for sure about Palin was that she opposed abortion and recently had given birth to a child with Down’s syndrome. Since then, Democrats and the press have done everything in their power to transform this populist hero into a gun-toting, idiotic, apocalyptic harpy.

Last year, in the space of eight weeks, the media said Palin was a Buchananite (she wasn’t), a member of the Alaska Independence Party (nope), a book-banner (wrong again), and a biblical literalist who believed dinosaurs roamed the Earth several thousand years ago (an utter fabrication). When it wasn’t mangling facts, the press did its best to undermine Palin’s accomplishments, from selling Governor Murkowski’s jet to finally pulling the plug on the Bridge to Nowhere to pushing through a natural gas pipeline with bipartisan support. The denizens of leftwing fever swamps accused Palin of infidelity and questioned her most recent pregnancy. Feminist activists denied Palin her womanhood because she did not share their politics. Comedians made fun of her accent, clothes, smarts, and good looks. And in a craven attempt to preserve their ties to the media, the campaign operatives who had promoted Palin to John McCain later turned on her, telling reporters (on background, of course) that Palin was an incompetent “rogue” “diva” who may have been suffering from postpartum depression.

Palin-hatred is visceral and unrelenting. “Our state was inundated with opposition researchers trying to dig up dirt, the Democratic blogosphere up here making stuff up,” Palin told me. The file on my desktop labeled “Insult List” is an attempt to track every foul thing that’s been said about Sarah Palin since she rose to national prominence. At the moment, the list is seven single-spaced pages long. Palin’s been called, among other things, a “bimbo,” a “cancer,” a “farce,” a “jack in the box,” a “provincial,” a “maniac,” an “airhead,” “Lady Gaga,” and “political slime.” And that’s just a small taste of the G-rated stuff. The blue material is far worse.

Unable or unwilling to grasp her true accomplishments and character, the media shoehorned Palin into a ready-made caricature of the know-nothing Christian PTA mom who enters politics because of “those damned lib’ruls.” The reality is far different. Palin is a savvy and charismatic politician whose career has been filled with courageous stands against entrenched authority. Ideological or partisan attachments do not concern her. She has her flaws–who doesn’t?–but they should be measured against her strengths. Instead the media ignored the positives and colluded with Palin’s adversaries to reduce her to a cartoon.

The attacks did not stop when McCain and Palin lost the election. To the contrary: They shifted location and emphasis. Palin returned to a changed Alaska. Her first year in office had been remarkably successful because she governed with an ad hoc legislative coalition of Democrats and antiestablishment Republicans. That coalition broke down the moment Palin became a force in national politics and the most famous woman (probably the most famous person) in the Republican party. The Democrats in the legislature defected en masse. Compounding the problem: Because she had unseated it, the GOP establishment never liked Palin and wanted her to go away.

Suddenly “people were confronted with policy differences with the governor,” Alaska state senator and Palin ally Gene Therriault told me. “The call went out from the national Democratic party to take her down. Some of the Democrats who worked with her previously took their marching orders.” Gridlock ensued. Bipartisan comity was no more.

Anybody who had the opportunity to score political points against Palin took a shot. The Alaska judicial council, a body that recommends jurists to the governor, forced the pro-life Palin to appoint a pro-choice judge to the state supreme court. The legislature rejected Palin’s choice for state attorney general. The governor and the legislature fought protracted battles over the replacement for Democratic state senator Kim Elton (appointed to the Obama administration) and stimulus money from the federal government. Civility with the legislature became untenable. John Coale, the Washington, D.C.-based Democratic lawyer who set up Palin’s political action committee and legal defense fund, told me, “Something had to change.”

The problem wasn’t so much Palin as it was Alaska. She had become too big for her home state. Bizarrely, her celebrity did not expand her political capital but erased it. The knives were out, and you could hear the sound of still more sharpening in the distance.

The moment warranted a bold move. John Bitney, a former Palin aide who has known the governor since they were in junior high, told me that in times like these Palin seeks spiritual and familial counsel. “Sarah Palin on a personal level is driven by spiritual guidance that has taken her to where she is today,” he wrote in an email exchange last week.

Bitney, whom Palin let go over personal differences in 2007, is worth quoting at length. “While she has learned to accept that guidance–she often alludes to it in her statements–she probably can’t explain it fully,” Bitney wrote. “And I am assuming that guidance is now apparently telling her it’s time to heal herself, her family, and get grounded for whatever the future holds. I can tell you that I have learned to respect her guidance (wherever it comes from), for it has given her strength and direction to some unparalleled political heights.”

Alaska ties down Palin in multiple ways. The state’s distance from the rest of America makes it difficult to travel to major cities (or small caucus and primary states) in the continental United States without a hefty time commitment and scheduling effort. So far this year, every time Palin traveled outside Alaska, her enemies inside the state pilloried her for neglecting her job. This is a standard that applied neither to George W. Bush, who traveled the country campaigning for president while he was still Texas governor, nor to Barack Obama, who spent two of his four years as a U.S. senator from Illinois running for president. Palin chafes at this inconsistency and still isn’t used to the idea that a different standard applies to her.

Then there are the ethics complaints. Practically everything Palin has done since returning home has been politicized by her enemies and, in some cases, criminalized. The moment she knew there would be trouble, Palin said, was when she returned to the governor’s office in Juneau after the November election. The gaggle of reporters assembled there asked her a few questions about the campaign. Palin answered them. Almost immediately, an ethics charge was filed against her for conducting political business from her state office. “That was part of the Democratic plan to grind her up,” state senator Therriault said. “Use the ethics law as a blunt instrument to club the administration.”

In her July 3 speech, Palin mentioned 15 ethics complaints leveled against her. The Anchorage Daily News counts 18. The Wall Street Journal reports that Palin’s office has been inundated with 150 FOIA requests for information regarding her schedule and contacts. Her staff is spending its time as unwilling participants in a giant fishing expedition. “They knew how to file these,” Palin said. “They knew what category to file them under. We got the fake people, we got the people filing online.”

The charges are frivolous. Some are just silly. One complaint said Palin violated the law by mentioning her vice presidential candidacy on her state website. Another said that her wearing a T-shirt with the insignia of Todd Palin’s sponsor in the Iron Dog snow-machine race constituted a conflict of interest. “It’s a cold, outdoor event,” Palin said. “I’ve been wearing Arctic Cat gear for many years. I wear a Carhartt coat and commercial fishing bibs, too.” Yet another complaint was filed under the name of a character from a British soap opera. One suspected it was only a matter of time before someone complained on behalf of the turkey who was decapitated in the background as Palin gave a television interview last Thanksgiving.

The state personnel board has dismissed the complaints, one after the other. According to the governor, however, when all is said and done–when one factors in all the wasted time and resources–the cost to Alaska amounts to some $2 million. “Why would I continue to put Alaskans through that?” Palin said. Furthermore, because state ethics law requires the accused to pay for her own defense, the Palins’ personal legal bills add up to around $500,000. The Palins aren’t poor, but they aren’t rich, either. Paying off the debt will take some effort. If Palin remained in office until the end of her term, the bills would just grow.

Some of the charges were so silly that Palin wanted to pay the fines and move on. “I got to the point where I said, ‘May I just plead guilty?’ ” she told me. But pleading guilty would have been political suicide. Palin’s opponents in the legislature would have moved to impeach her on the flimsiest of pretexts. She had to fight it out, whether or not it was costing her money and peace of mind. “In politics you’re either eating well or sleeping well,” Palin said. “I want to be able to sleep well.”

The accusations affected Palin emotionally. A rare and necessary talent for a great politician is the capacity to ignore or laugh off the critics’ most vicious assaults. FDR had it. So did Reagan. When Palin spoke at the 2008 Republican convention, it seemed as though she had it, too. Her commanding performance gave the impression that the previous week’s falsehoods, exaggerations, myths, insults, and smears did not matter to her. Not one bit.

This doesn’t seem to be the case anymore, however. Over time, the attacks on Palin–on her character, intellect, appearance, femininity, and family–clearly got to her. One associate told me that, after the election, Palin made a habit of listening to talk radio, attempting to track what pundits were saying about her. Her Momma Grizzly instincts came out whenever her sons and daughters were mentioned. In January, she gave a rare interview to the libertarian documentary filmmaker John Ziegler on media bias. She could hardly give a speech in which she did not mention elite condescension and her ill-treatment at the hands of Katie Couric and leftwing bloggers. Her public performances became personal testimonials to the damage the media can inflict on a person’s reputation and career. Palin was right, of course. But these were arguments for polemicists to make, not statesmen.

Palin thought she could respond to every attack. But no one can respond to every attack. Nor should they. Hatred and slander aimed at the people who disagree with you is a lamentable yet unremarkable fact of American politics. The vitriol is the heap of dirty laundry in the corner of a room that everybody pretends to ignore. A politician just has to live with the smell.

Palin is not a normal politician, however. For one thing, she is a newcomer to the national arena. The bulk of her career has been at the local and state level, where the stakes and the tempers are low compared with the rock ’em, sock ’em dramas that play out inside the Beltway and on the cable channels and blogs. “Everyone else in ’08 had been in the game for decades,” John Coale said. “They all had been there. This was somebody playing for the first time.” For Palin, the hostility directed at her was novel and shocking. Because she prides herself on her unconventionality, and because she knows how to win a political knife-fight, she decided to fight back.

The turning point came in June. On June 3, Palin introduced the conservative radio talk-show host Michael Reagan at a dinner in Anchorage. In her introduction, Palin clumsily paraphrased from articles by Newt Gingrich and author Craig Shirley. Palin attributed the statements to Gingrich and Shirley, but she was a little sloppy in doing so. Predictably, a leftwing blogger soon took to the Huffington Post–a virtual coffee klatch for Palin-haters–claiming that the governor was guilty of plagiarism.

The charge did not go unanswered. Palin’s lawyer issued a statement saying that the blogger’s accusation was ridiculous, which it was, especially considering that both the current president and vice president are known to have lifted passages from other politicians in the past without any attribution whatsoever. Both Gingrich and Shirley said no plagiarism had occurred. The round went to Palin.

Next, on June 8, the late-night comedian David Letterman made a partisan, crude, and unfunny joke involving baseball star Alex Rodriguez and Palin’s underage daughter Willow. The former had “knocked up” the latter, Letterman said, on the Palins’ recent trip to New York City. (In his monologue, Letterman also said Palin had a “slutty flight-attendant look.”) Palin didn’t watch the show, but the next day a reporter asked for her reaction. When the reporter read the joke to her, Palin was taken aback. She called it disgusting. What happened next shocked her even more. “The reaction to my candid and heartfelt response blew me away,” Palin said. “I all of a sudden became the bad guy. Who says I don’t have the right to give a candid and heartfelt response? The reaction to it really opened my eyes: This is ridiculous. You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.”

Palin demanded that Letterman apologize. She defended her position on the airwaves. Less than a week later, Letterman said the nasty crack actually had been directed at Palin’s 18-year-old daughter Bristol, as though that made it any less tasteless. Then Letterman admitted he’d been wrong to make the joke in the first place. Palin had won again.

In late June, an Alaska Democratic blogger pasted the face of a pro-Palin radio talk-show host on the body of Palin’s son Trig. The governor’s camp released a withering statement, saying, “The mere idea of someone doctoring the photo of a special needs baby is appalling. To learn that two Alaskans did it is absolutely sickening. .  .  . Babies and children are off limits.” The blogger backtracked. She said she only had intended to ridicule the talk show host, like that made any difference. “What if I hadn’t responded?” Palin said. “Well, then, the criticism would be, can’t you stand up for the special needs community?” The constant bickering and shifting standards rankled her. “Well, enough is enough,” she said. “I would like the opportunity to speak up and speak out.”

Palin’s new combativeness is pronounced. When she announced her resignation, the Internet rumor mill went into high gear. Lefty bloggers could not countenance the idea that the woman to whom they devote such enmity might actually be resigning for her stated reasons alone. There must be some other story, they wrote, some other snowshoe waiting to drop. The CNN anchor Rick Sanchez speculated on air that Palin might be pregnant. The Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore wrote on the Huffington Post that Palin resigned because she was “under federal investigation” for self-dealing in the construction of a recreation center in Wasilla. Other liberal bloggers parroted Moore’s baseless accusations. Palin’s team wasted no time in issuing a statement from the governor’s lawyer that shot down Moore’s blog. “We will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation,” the lawyer wrote. The FBI also came out and said Palin was not the subject of an investigation. Another malicious story batted down.

Palin had made a clear decision to defend her family’s honor. “The toll on her family from all the events over the past three years has been extraordinary,” John Bitney wrote in his email to me. “She had a baby, Bristol had a baby, Track was sent overseas, and no doubt Piper and Willow have all the day-to-day issues that come from young women growing up.” The parade of outrages against her and her children didn’t help.

Yet a politician’s job is to serve her constituents, not bicker with comedians. Palin has been caught in a bind. Her global celebrity has been in tension with her duties to Alaska. Had she remained in office, the tension would have become more pronounced. Meanwhile, the agenda on which she defeated Frank Murkowski has been enacted into law. One more year in office would mean additional legal bills and constant juggling between the demands of family, work, and fame. The job had become demanding and unpleasant.

So Palin let go.

Palin has begun ramping up her criticism of President Obama. “Somebody’s got to start asking President Obama questions” about how he plans to pay for his agenda, Palin said. In her July 3 speech, she blasted “debt-ridden stimulus dollars,” said that “today’s Big Government spending” is “immoral and doesn’t even make economic sense,” and called the national debt “obscene.” In an interview last week with Time magazine, she called cap-and-trade “cap-and-tax,” and said the policy would “drive the cost of consumer goods and cost of energy so extremely high that our nation is going to start exporting even more jobs to China.” I asked Palin about President Obama’s response to the democratic upheaval in Iran. “Maybe they’re tougher behind closed doors,” she said. She noted that there were plenty of things “the most powerful man in the world” could do to help bring down Ahmadinejad, including a new round of international sanctions. She went after Obama’s rhetoric. “It’s not ‘meddling’ in another country’s business when you understand that what happens over there affects us over here,” she said. “I wish Obama was tougher in that area.”

Speculation about Sarah Palin’s presidential ambitions is premature. She herself probably does not know her next move. There is a strong chance that the unpredictable Palin may decide against running for any office, ever. You never know. But since the presidency so captivates Americans, and since the most recent vice presidential nominee has as much of a claim on the next presidential nomination as anyone, “Palin for President” (Tippecanoe and Piper too!) stories will be around for years to come.

Did Palin’s surprise resignation help her chances? The flippant answer is, “Check back in four years, bub.” The serious answer is, “There’s no strong consensus one way or the other.” When Palin announced her resignation, the conventional wisdom immediately gelled behind the position that she could no longer win the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. Maybe. Slowly and haltingly, however, an alternative theory emerged that said the move might not damage Palin as much as the establishment believed it would.

The polling evidence seems to confirm this. So far, Palin’s fans have viewed her decision not to seek reelection sympathetically. A Gallup poll released on July 8 recorded that 67 percent of Republicans wanted Palin to have a role as a national political figure. A Rasmussen poll from last week found that Mitt Romney, Palin, and Mike Huckabee are in a statistical tie for the nomination.

Palin has a devoted following. No Republican politician energizes GOP crowds as much as she does. When I saw her speak at the Vanderburgh County Right to Life dinner in Evansville, Indiana, in April, Palin was practically mobbed by well-wishers and autograph seekers. The conservative movement is rudderless, and social conservatives in particular would like a powerful spokesman for their cause. The social issues may not have played much of a role during Palin’s governorship, but once she is free from office she can emphasize them as much as she likes.

One lesson from Barack Obama’s candidacy is that a politician should seize his (or her) moment. Elite opinion, remember, thought that Barack Obama wasn’t ready to run for president in 2008. He should sit back, the argument went. Gain seasoning. Master a few issues. Wait for his turn. But Obama understood that when you do that, you end up being Joe Biden. Obama understood that once the spotlight is on you, it’s foolish to let it pass on to someone else. He ignored the naysayers. He launched his campaign. Now he lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Reagan’s late campaign manager John Sears had a term to describe what voters look for in a presidential candidate. The term was “appropriateness.” Sears meant that John Q. Public wants to support the guy that best fits his mental picture of what a president should be. Does Palin have such “appropriateness”? The verdict is mixed. Certainly there’s a latent hunger for a viable female presidential candidate who isn’t Hillary Clinton. Palin, moreover, looked authentic and commanding in her speech to the 2008 Republican National Convention. It is not an exaggeration to say that her address there was one of the most effective political communications ever. In the vice presidential debate, Palin went toe-to-toe with Biden, the paradigmatic Beltway insider, and gave as good as–if not better than–she got.

Throughout her career, Palin has seemed most “appropriate” at moments when she senses that the populace is diverging from the political class that rules over it. Palin exploits the split and wins office as the tribune of the people. That is what happened when she saw that Wasillans were tired of the nonideological, nonpartisan, unexciting mayoralty of John Stein; when she saw self-dealing among Republican insiders in Anchorage and Juneau; when she saw that Alaskans were tired of Frank Murkowski and the lobbyist culture he nursed and protected. That is what she and John McCain tried to do last year, when Americans had grown tired of George W. Bush and Republican misrule (things didn’t work out the way they’d hoped). The next time Palin sees a gap separating the people and their government, she may try to jump in and fill it.

For now, though, Palin will focus on writing her book, on the midterm elections, and on giving speeches. One certainty is that neither she nor the people who love and hate her are going away. “It’s not retreat,” Palin said. “It’s moving more aggressively than ever to fight for what’s right.” Today the Palinistas and Palinphobes are as much a part of the national scene as they have been part of Alaska’s. Since her debut, Palin has sparked curiosity and revulsion, devotion and illwill, admiration and scorn in equal measure. For whatever reason, the press cannot take its unblinking eye off of her. To the media and her detractors, she is a force of nature. She cannot be ignored.

The obsession is sure to intensify. Be prepared. Hurricane Sarah is about to descend on the Lower 48.

Matthew Continetti is the associate editor of THE WEEKLY STANDARD. His The Persecution of Sarah Palin will be published by Penguin Sentinel in 2010.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Conservative Girl with a Book: A Post by Conservative Girl with a Voice

Posted by conservativegirlwithavoice on February 18, 2011

As a lover of literature- political literature being my favorite, I have longed enjoyed reading books by a variety of authors. When I first started this blog, I realized there was a need to inform individuals with the truth and the facts. As a young conservative, I have been blessed to have amazing readers who inspire me each and everyday to continue writing. It is because of this and at the urging of others that I have decided to write a book targeting young conservatives and beyond. I have been amazed at the number of young people who have commented that they can really identify with me because of their conservative beliefs. In writing this book, I want to educate other young conservatives about the importance of getting involved politically and let them know that they are not alone in their conservative thinking.

There are so many “Hollywood” types out there who attempt to tell us what to believe. You do not only see this in Hollywood. Meghan McCain is a good example of a young person who basically goes out there calling herself a Republican when it is clear she is not. In typical RINO fashion, she attempts to speak for young people like myself, and whenever it is announced that she is to be a guest on a nightly news show, I immediately cringed. I did not always feel this way. There was a time when I admired Meghan McCain and the way in which she stood up for her father and his political beliefs. This admiration turned to disappointment after the election when she repeatedly spoke out against the Republican principles I firmly stand on the side of. Now, it appears that the only things I share with Meghan McCain are hair and eye color. The young conservatives I communicate with feel the same way. They are sick and tired of young people like Miss McCain who speak for them or tell them what they should believe. It is time for these young, conservative Republicans to tell their stories about what conservatism means to them, and I cannot wait to speak with young conservatives from all across the country and include their stories in the book.

As a woman from California, people I meet immediately assume I hold liberal beliefs. At first, I kind of laugh it off, but the more I think about it, I really cannot blame them for thinking this way. For years, the media and society have repeatedly played the “gender card,” basically trying their best to convince us that a majority of modern-day women hold liberal ideologies. This is a misguided notion, for there are many women out there just like me who believe in conservative principles. Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are two strong, modern-day women who have shattered this glass ceiling. These conservative, pro-life women are two of my role models, and I know I am definitely not alone in feeling this way.

I have already started the book preparation process, and I cannot wait to see where this journey takes me. Thanks so much for continuing to inspire me and for taking the time to read my blog!!! Now, let the writing begin….

(Click here to visit Conservative Girl with a Voice and become a follower. Follow me on Twitter @RachelleFriberg.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

Palin Nears 3 Million Facebook Members-$1 Billion Campaign 2012 Fund A Certainty

Posted by M.Joseph Sheppard At Palin4President2016 on February 18, 2011

During the period of July to October 2012, $100 a month on average raised from each of 3,000,000 supporters equals a campaign chest for Sarah Palin of $1,200,000,000. And that is just for starters, as corporate America – which the Supreme Court has ruled can contribute to any sum – will add millions also as will major donors/fund raisers. Therefore a campaign fund well over one billion dollars is absolutely obtainable.

In point of fact there would be every reason to believe that if Governor Palin is the Republican nominee, that role would have been decided well before July 2012. That being the case, but even if it was not so decided, it is reasonable to assume that by then her Facebook membership would be at least 5 million. More likely it will be well north of that figure, based on the current rate of growth.

If it was five million at that point, with every reason to believe it would be, and two million people were stripped out, being very young, opponents, very poor, there would still be a potential donor pool of 3 million people.

I recall receiving a letter some time ago from a couple who described themselves as “ordinary people.”  They said they were prepared to donate $50 a week each from their wages to support Governor Palin’s 2012 election campaign “when the time came.”

They said they felt certain they spoke for many more, who just like themselves, believed in Sarah. “She will prevail because millions of ordinary people like us will make the sacrifice needed to support her.”

Thus if three million people gave an average of $25 a week from July to October 2012, i.e. $100 a month on average, over the four-month campaign (which I pledge myself to do), then $1,200,000,000+ can be raised.  This donation amount is not unrealistic in the light of those of previous campaigns.  It is up to 1.2 Billion (4 months X $100. per month = $400. X 3 = $1200 X 1 million = 1200 million = 1,,200,000,000 or 1.2 billion) but I have put in a lower figure to allow for as realistic an analysis as possible.

This, plus the corporate and major donors, gives well over one billion dollars to a fighting campaign. Every cent of that figure would be required to counter the forces of the radical left, who will do everything they can, everything that money can buy, allied to their control of the media and union forces, to defeat the forces of the light.

November 2010 showed that the forces of the light can prevail against the forces of darkness, and with Sarah Palin as the torch-bearer in 2012, it will be so proven again. But only after a terrible fight, and with the financial support outlined above.

A people’s victory can only be won with the people’s support, which includes financial backing.  The American people will not fail in this chance of a lifetime to reinstate traditional values.

Link to this article at:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Long Island gets personal with Palin

Posted by loricalabrese on February 18, 2011

The Long Island Association hosted Governor Sarah Palin at the Crest Hollow Country Club on Thursday in Woodbury, New York for their annual luncheon, giving Long Island and myself the opportunity to get personal with Palin.

This event was particularly significant for Palin as it was unlike many others she’s participated in. The former governor did not deliver a speech standing behind a podium. She didn’t appear in her home studio for a FOX News appearance. But instead, the former Governor participated in an informal Q & A with the president of the Long Island Association, Kevin Law. Two chairs were front and center on stage and the casual sit-down felt like an everyday lunch where the topics on everyone’s minds were tossed around the table—including the budget, debt ceiling vote, a government shut-down, gun control, and, of course, 2012.

Palin didn’t have a star-studded arrival. In fact, it was very low-key. She arrived with her entourage, none other than her daughter, Bristol. In fact, if you blinked, you might have missed Palin walk onto the stage with the board members of the LIA. She held her head high as the National Anthem was sung and cheered on the Color Guard as they displayed the flag.

Continue Reading (and see a slideshow) at

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »