Sarah Palin Information Blog

Sarah Palin Web Brigade

  • Upcoming Palin Events

  • Sarah Palin’s Endorsees

  • Sarah Palin Channel

  • Amazing America

  • The Undefeated

  • ‘Stars Earn Stripes’

  • ‘Game Change’ Lies Exposed

  • Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas

  • Our Sarah: Made in Alaska

  • America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag

  • Going Rogue: An American Life

  • Other Sarah Palin Info Sources

  • Login/RSS

  • Governor Palin on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinUSA

  • Governor Palin on Facebook

  • SarahPAC Notes

  • RSS SarahPAC Notes

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • SPWB on Facebook

  • SPWB on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinLinks

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Join the SPWB Twibe!

  • Posts by Date

    June 2013
    S M T W T F S
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • __________________________________________
  • Top Posts & Pages

  • __________________________________________
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • __________________________________________

Archive for June 25th, 2013

Gov. Palin: Public needs to seek truth about Obama’s proposed energy mandate

Posted by Dr. Fay on June 25, 2013

Governor Palin tweeted this early this morning:

She was referring to Obama’s upcoming speech at Georgetown University in which he plans to lay out his agenda for combatting climate change.  Governor Palin and others see it for what it is – a plan to weaken our country even further through burdensome regulations. reports:

President Obama will announce Tuesday he is planning to sidestep Congress to  implement a national plan to combat climate change that will include the  first-ever federal regulations on carbon dioxide emitted by existing power  plants, despite adamant opposition from Republicans and some energy  producers.

In a speech at Georgetown University Tuesday, Obama will announce he’s  issuing a presidential memorandum to implement the regulations, meaning none of  the steps involved in the plan will require congressional approval.

In addition, Obama will say he is directing his administration to allow  enough renewables on public lands to power 6 million homes by 2020, effectively  doubling the capacity from solar, wind and geothermal projects on federal  property.

Obama also was to announce $8 billion in federal loan guarantees to spur  investment in technologies that can keep carbon dioxide produced by power plants  from being released into the atmosphere.

In taking action on his own, Obama is also signaling he will no longer wait  for lawmakers to act on climate change, and instead will seek ways to work  around them.


However, critics say that Obama’s changes will create more problems for  America’s coal industry.

“This proposal will buttress an EPA proposed rule issued last year for new  power plants that will essentially ban coal’s use in the future,” Tom Borelli, a  senior fellow at FreedomWorks, told

Forty percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, and one-third of greenhouse  gases overall, come from electric power plants, according to the U.S. Energy  Information Administration, the Energy Department’s statistical agency.


The poor prospects for getting any major climate legislation through a  Republican-controlled House were on display last week when Speaker John Boehner  responded to the prospect that Obama would put forth controls on existing power  plants by deeming the idea “absolutely crazy.”

“Why would you want to increase the cost of energy and kill more American  jobs?” said Boehner, R-Ohio, echoing the warnings of some industry groups.

Read more.

Derek Hunter at had this to say previously about the effect of Obama’s energy regulations on the price of electricity:

Electricity Bills Are About to ‘Necessarily Skyrocket’

by            Derek Hunter9 Jun 2012

In January of 2008, then Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama, talking about his energy plan, told the San Francisco Chronicle, “When I was asked earlier about the issue of coal…under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket…” He wasn’t kidding.

While he was talking about his cap and trade plan, something that went nowhere in Congress, even when Democrats controlled it with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, his objective of changing how we generate electricity hasn’t changed. Neither has his lack of concern for the cost to consumers.

President Obama hates coal because he has deemed it too “dirty.” It’s also the largest generator of electricity in this country. Were there a cheaper, easier (and even cleaner) source of electricity generation, the market would have embraced it because that’s how markets work. But there isn’t, at least not yet.

But rather than allow the market to work, something new to be developed, the President seeks to force it, to steer it where he wants it to go. It’s something politicians have tried to do since there was a market to steer, and something they’ve failed to do successfully since their first try (Great Leap Forward anyone?).

President Obama wants to steer electricity generation away from coal to natural gas. The only problem with that is our system is set up for coal, coal is abundant, and coal is easier to get. While the market may naturally gravitate to natural gas as it becomes easier to get through fracking – something the Left has demonized and is fighting – we’re not there yet.

Just like the public and humiliating failures of subsidized solar companies like Solyndra and so many others, the technology may be there, but simply existing doesn’t make it practical. Neither does willing it to be.

The automobile existed for years before it took over from trains and streetcars as the dominant mode of transportation, not because it didn’t work, but because it took until Henry Ford found a way to make them affordable. The government didn’t force it, the market did.

President Obama, through the power of regulation, is seeking to force the electricity generation market in a direction it simply isn’t ready to go. And consumers will be the ones who suffer.

Coal fueled electricity generating plants can’t just flip a switch and use natural gas.  Changing them over is time consuming and, most importantly to consumers, very expensive. The cost of doing so will not be eaten by these electric companies; it will be passed on to consumers. And, as President Obama said, the electric bills of those consumers will “necessarily skyrocket.”

This isn’t just hyperbole. A survey of electricity executive indicates 90 percent of them expect the costs of moving away from coal power plants to lead to higher electricity bills for consumers. More than half of the survey respondents predict at least a 10 percent increase.


But don’t expect this White House to care. They have no reason to. These price spikes are a few years away and will come long after President Obama will face voters for the last time. He’ll either be a President in his last term or a former President, neither of which carry accountability.

The accountability must come now, before it’s too late.

Congress can move against the President’s plans to regulate existing and new power coal power plants, but that is unlikely with the Senate being controlled by Democrats. It would also require him not to veto any action Congress takes, which won’t happen either. So right now, this is the future we’re facing.

Since legislative action or a regulatory change of course are unlikely, voter education is the only hope. The promise of “green energy” sounds great, but it’s just sounds at this point. We may get to the point where we can generate the electricity we need through sheer force of will or some other way the global warming true believers support, but that will have to come the way every important innovation in all areas of the economy have come – through the market finding a profitable way to meet consumer demand.  We aren’t there yet.

Until we get there, coal is still the best, most efficient,and most affordable source of the electricity we need. All the regulations and wishes in the world won’t change that fact, only the market can.

Read more.


John Nolte added this later today:

After 15 years of no increase in global temperatures — which decimates a huge majority of Climate Change models — our anti-science president took to the stump today for what was promised as a major speech on what he was going to do by executive fiat to save the world. Of all three cable news networks, though, it was his own peanut gallery at MSNBC who bailed first, broadcasting only 41 seconds of the speech.

Fox News gave the president nearly five minutes. CNN covered the event for about eight minutes.

The Weather Channel was there for the full 49 minutes.

Between NSA leaker Edward Snowden, today’s Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act, and the ongoing George Zimmerman trial, President Obama can’t even get a minute’s worth of love from his PR firm over at NBC News.

Read more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »