Sarah Palin Information Blog

Sarah Palin Web Brigade

  • Upcoming Palin Events

  • Sarah Palin’s Endorsees

  • Sarah Palin Channel

  • Amazing America

  • The Undefeated

  • ‘Stars Earn Stripes’

  • ‘Game Change’ Lies Exposed

  • Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas

  • Our Sarah: Made in Alaska

  • America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag

  • Going Rogue: An American Life

  • Other Sarah Palin Info Sources

  • Login/RSS

  • Governor Palin on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinUSA

  • Governor Palin on Facebook

  • SarahPAC Notes

  • RSS SarahPAC Notes

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • SPWB on Facebook

  • SPWB on Twitter

  • @SarahPalinLinks

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Join the SPWB Twibe!

  • Posts by Date

    February 2009
    S M T W T F S
        Mar »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • __________________________________________
  • Top Posts & Pages

  • __________________________________________
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • __________________________________________

Archive for February 22nd, 2009

Bearing Up

Posted by Sarah Palin Web Brigade on February 22, 2009

 
By SARAH PALIN
Published: January 5, 2008
Juneau, Alaska
 

ABOUT the closest most Americans will ever get to a polar bear are those cute, cuddly animated images that smiled at us while dancing around, pitching soft drinks on TV and movie screens this holiday season.

This is unfortunate, because polar bears are magnificent animals, not cartoon characters. They are worthy of our utmost efforts to protect them and their Arctic habitat. But adding polar bears to the nation’s list of endangered species, as some are now proposing, should not be part of those efforts.

To help ensure that polar bears are around for centuries to come, Alaska (about a fifth of the world’s 25,000 polar bears roam in and around the state) has conducted research and worked closely with the federal government to protect them. We have a ban on most hunting — only Alaska Native subsistence families can hunt polar bears — and measures to protect denning areas and prevent harassment of the bears. We are also participating in international efforts aimed at preserving polar bear populations worldwide.

This month, the secretary of the interior is expected to rule on whether polar bears should be listed under the Endangered Species Act. I strongly believe that adding them to the list is the wrong move at this time. My decision is based on a comprehensive review by state wildlife officials of scientific information from a broad range of climate, ice and polar bear experts.

The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group, has argued that global warming and the reduction of polar ice severely threatens the bears’ habitat and their existence. In fact, there is insufficient evidence that polar bears are in danger of becoming extinct within the foreseeable future — the trigger for protection under the Endangered Species Act. And there is no evidence that polar bears are being mismanaged through existing international agreements and the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act.

The state takes very seriously its job of protecting polar bears and their habitat and is well aware of the problems caused by climate change. But we know our efforts will take more than protecting what we have — we must also learn what we don’t know. That’s why state biologists are studying the health of polar bear populations and their habitat.

As a result of these efforts, polar bears are more numerous now than they were 40 years ago. The polar bear population in the southern Beaufort Sea off Alaska’s North Slope has been relatively stable for 20 years, according to a federal analysis.

We’re not against protecting plants and animals under the Endangered Species Act. Alaska has supported listings of other species, like the Aleutian Canada goose. The law worked as it should — under its protection the population of the geese rebounded so much that they were taken off the list of endangered and threatened species in 2001.

Listing the goose — then taking it off — was based on science. The possible listing of a healthy species like the polar bear would be based on uncertain modeling of possible effects. This is simply not justified.

What is justified is worldwide concern over the proven effects of climate change.

The Center for Biological Diversity, which petitioned for the polar bear to be protected, wants the listing to force the government to either stop or severely limit any public or private action that produces, or even allows, the production of greenhouse gases. But the Endangered Species Act is not the correct tool to address climate change — the act itself actually prohibits any consideration of broader issues.

Such limits should be adopted through an open process in which environmental issues are weighed against economic and social needs, and where scientists debate and present information that policy makers need to make the best decisions.

Americans should become involved in the issue of climate change by offering suggestions for constructive action to their state governments. But listing the polar bear as threatened is the wrong way to get to the right answer.

Sarah Palin, a Republican, is the governor of Alaska.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/opinion/05palin.html

Bookmark and Share

Advertisements

Posted in Alaskan Wildlife, Governor Sarah Palin, Media, Uncategorized, Wildlife | 1 Comment »

Sarah Palin Encourages Special Needs Families

Posted by Sarah Palin Web Brigade on February 22, 2009


Christian Examiner
Palin encourages special needs families
by Elizabeth Wood

December 12, 2008
WASHINGTON — One of the most valuable aspects of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s vice presidential candidacy was her focusing national attention on the strengths and value of special needs children, says a pro-life leader and mother of a special needs child.

“Her child, my child and every special needs child are not to be pitied,” said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, in a written statement. “What a salve to the soul that Palin understands and articulates this. It brings so many special people and their families out of the shadows and into the limelight. They have so much to be proud of, and she helps them recognize that.”

Palin’s fifth child, Trig, entered the world in April prenatally diagnosed with Down syndrome. Advocacy organizations, along with parents of special needs children, agree that Palin helped raise awareness and appreciation for children diagnosed with special needs.

What effect Trig Palin’s national profile — and his family’s loving care for him — will have on the abortion rate for babies diagnosed with Down syndrome remains to be seen. An estimated 90 percent of unborn children diagnosed with Down syndrome are aborted, as are a similar percentage of babies diagnosed with spina bifida, cystic fibrosis and dwarfism, Sen. Sam Brownback, R.-Kan., has said.

While Palin was in the midst of campaigning this fall, Brownback and his allies were seeking passage of a bill to address the alarming abortion rate for special needs children. In late September, Congress approved Brownback’s legislation to require doctors to provide accurate information and data on support services for parents whose unborn children are diagnosed with special needs. President Bush signed the Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act into law Oct. 8.

David Prentice, senior fellow of life sciences at the Family Research Council, said he hopes to see both Palin’s national example and the Brownback legislation help reduce abortion rates and change attitudes toward those with disabilities.

“Even if all this did was save one life, it would be well worth it,” Prentice said.

Dannenfelser believes it is too early to tell whether or not the Palin and Brownback factors will help reduce abortion rates. She said she hopes mothers will rise above the challenge when they have resources and support.

There is no question Sarah and Trig Palin gave a boost to families with special needs children. Parents of children with Down syndrome and other conditions said Trig’s entry onto the national scene made them feel as if their voice had been heard for the first time.

“I was so happy when I heard about Sarah Palin,” said Kadi Coe, a Michigan mother of a child with Down syndrome. “When she was announced as [Sen. John McCain’s] running mate, I was so excited she would raise awareness about Down syndrome. I thought to myself, ‘Hey, if she can do it, so can I.'”

Robin Steele, adoption awareness program coordinator for the Down Syndrome Association of Greater Cincinnati, sensed an atmosphere of excitement in the Down syndrome community when Palin gave birth to Trig, months before Palin was put on the Republican ticket. She said awareness of the scenario was publicized to the whole community.

Since giving birth to Trig, Palin has said she views children with special needs as a “joyful challenge” and “priority,” rather than a burden. In a letter addressed to family and friends after Trig’s birth, Palin referred to her son as an “absolutely perfect” baby.

Since Steele began working for the association 27 years ago, she has seen an increase in interest among families to adopt Down syndrome babies. She desires to see more.

“The first year I started my job, I got three calls [from families interested in adoption],” Steele said. “Now, we get three to five a week. I am very hopeful the number of adoptions will increase.”

Andrea Roberts also has a passion for helping parents adopt children with Down syndrome. She founded Reece’s Rainbow, an international adoption ministry for children with Down syndrome. It helped facilitate 120 international adoptions for families in the last two years.

The ministry is a volunteered-based organization that serves as a “vehicle” for people to make donations to families toward the adoption process, Roberts told BP.

“We saw a need to raise awareness overseas,” said Roberts, who lives in Maryland. “To see the way those children are lined up in cribs, American families just can’t relate. The problem is never ending…. Every child that we see has a voice now through Reece’s Rainbow and has a chance.”

The Christmas Tree Angel Project, which is the organization’s largest fundraiser of the year, lasts until Dec. 31. People have a chance to go to the organization’s website and sponsor a child.

“Every penny goes to save a child’s life,” Roberts said. “This is a way to really make a difference.”

http://www.christianexaminer.com/Articles/Articles%20Dec08/Art_Dec08_12.html

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Children with Special Needs | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »